Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Prita Case, Not Finished Yet

Looks like the case between Prita with Omni International has not been completed despite the criticism and the support already given by many people even had no coins to Prita action as an expression and form of support for Pritchard in the face of charges filed by the Omni International did not dampen the intention of parties Omni to take the matter to trial and even now the case has been to stage the Review to the Supreme Court as the highest judicial institution in Indonesia.

Fill in Review (PK) Prita Mulyasari ready team of lawyers filed to the Supreme Court. PK surrounding material inconsistencies in the legal considerations which judges between civil and criminal.

According to one lawyer Pritchard, Slamet Yuwono, there is less oversight of judges so that Pritchard level cassation (Supreme Court).

"There are three reasons for the Novum, the opposition decision and an oversight or mistake a judge. There is a disagreement the decision in the case of Pritchard," said Pritchard's lawyer Mulyasari, Slamet Yuwono when met at the District Court (PN) Jakarta Selatan, Jl Raya Ampera, Tuesday (26 / 7 / 2011).

Slamet said the civil verdict against the Omni International, which was won Pritchard, consideration of a civil verdict led Judge Harifin Tumpa is what it says Pritchard via electronic mail a complaint.

Pritchard later statement does not intend to insult, not a tort that resulted in losses as well as to the criminal case had been released at the Tangerang District Court. In criminal trials at Tangerang District Court, said Slamet, these considerations are correct.

"For this reason only complaint for the sake of society and the fact that many experienced Pritchard," said Slamet

While the criminal verdict Pritchard who decided he was guilty, said his actions led to the defamation victim witness widespread and not erased until whenever.

"No peace among the witnesses Pritchard Henky dr and dr Grace," he said.

Besides other considerations which Pritchard email is not criticism for the public interest to avoid the practice of hospitals or doctors are not giving good service.

"This decision is no contradiction. It exists in memory PK," he said.

According to the judges, said Slamet, Pritchard should report cases that experienced the MKDKI (Honorary Board of Medicine Disciplinary Indonesia).

"But it's going to complain to MKDI how delivered, the contents of all physicians, they must defend their profession," he said.

Looks like this Prita case be a lesson for us all to be more careful in complaining about the service of an institution, company or other institution because it could have happened to us like Prita case especially in Indonesia has been very clearly sided with the people who have money not small people.

Watch prita video below:

No comments:

Post a Comment